Teleportation?

I received questions from a student about method of execution as well as identification of the elements which he is struggling with.

“So to start with teleportation, well what I call it but using the X model to change perception to another apparent location

1. Would the destination be the elementon?

2. Is my body/mind or destination the Ion structure?

3. Can breathing and heart beat be viable potential energy sources?

4. What are the representations for a geographical location?”

To help answer your questions:

1. The destination is the 'elementon' element. The perspective is a representation much the same way the URL you typed to access this page changes the perspective of the browser. The URL is the unique identifier representing something else. If the URL is too long you could use a link shortener such as http://sh.st/eWGRv to represent the original URL. However, the URL you see in your address bar is itself a representation of the resultant perspective. And the perspective is a representation of something else.

Layers upon layers upon layers of representation.

In your example, the destination is not some where you go. It is a matter of a change in perspective. By combining certain representations together, we change perspectives.

If I were to add a carton of milk next to your computer monitor, your entire perspective would change. Meaning, the carton of milk would have an effect on everything in your perspective.

The destination is also comprised of the other 3 elements (otherwise it would not exist).

However, the main element is representation.

You could think, "What is it filled most with?" in order to determine what element something most is.

"Teleporting" to an empty room of the year 2035 would be much trickier than teleporting to a busy street corner of the same year, though, as it would be more unlikely that the "empty room" group of representations would link with your current ones. (That is to say, more difficult to get there from where you are because there are much fewer links to it.)

2. Anything could be anything. You can use it as such but the result would be different from what you may have wanted. It all depends on your intention. For some purposes, you may want your mind to serve as "potential energy" and in others as "interaction" or "structure".

3. It all depends on perspective. Do you mean the sound of a heart beat, the pulsation, the light, biology, etc? Each perspective may be best served by a different element. As noted in #3, breathing could function as any element. For purposes of changing physical perspective, however, I think breath is more interactive.

Here is the formula: Representation = Structure (Potential Energy squared - potential energy) + Interaction

There's not much you can do with this without the 'what comes next' (my next version).

But it basically says (in one interpretation, and for a specific example) that if you want to time travel to the year 1932 focus, instead, on standing on a street corner with your left arm at a certain angle and legs slightly bent because you are selling newspapers and your feet hurt (structure) the static and air (potential energy) produces ambient sounds and a feeling, especially when the cars drive past you (interaction).

There are an endless variety of 1932's of course. But you may find that each is somehow represented in your 'new' 1932 perspective. You are actually there, as much as anyone 'was' at the time. You have not created the paperboy but are experiencing the value of something that already exists, and interpreting it in your own meaningful way (via your own logic).

The information I release includes the 'bridge' language between English and X (I call it Ec) that can be used as a kind of teleportation device. You can try to imagine the example above now but Ec will be far more effective for this.

Consider it a much needed software upgrade that takes you from 300 baud modems and BBSes to the Internet. Every aspect of your conscious thinking is permeated with the 'sound' of your brain's mother tongue. You can't experience it if it is not represented. You cannot experience the burning sensation of copying your thoughts to the internet until you use and value "xtioghtu", making the representation relative to your experience. (There is no xtioghtu but I used it just for illustrative purposes.) It's as much as the meaning being invented, used, and valued as the device itself. It could be said that there is no difference.

In X each of the above possibilities 3 paragraphs up would be represented in sets, and you would interact with the representations in order to achieve the other perspective. This can then be verbalized to alter perspective, much like what our Ancient Egyptians are doing and pop stars try so hard to do with English.

4. There are no geographical locations. That's more of a cognitive trick. It could be said, for example, that two chairs at 5 feet apart in a corn field are further away from one another in space-time than one of the chairs would be with a pole in a Las Vegas strip club. Both perspectives are logical. However, each is useful for different purposes.

Future humans, so to speak, do not traverse the verse in their "UFOs" thinking of a space as a 1-2-3-place. It's useful when you walk with legs but we should not let our legs do the thinking when we really want to be somewhere.