Shifting Relativity of Variables In Our Field of Existence

Is it possible to control the variables using the X model?

It's possible to control the variables using many other models, too. However, it's more of a change of our own personal logic than "control".

To affect change, the tools we use need to be logical to our experience. (In fact, we develop and use the tools in order that our own logic may be illustrated.)

For example, ancient humans may have seen a stone wall and danced around it in order to bring it down. Depending upon their particular group-logic, some methods would have worked while others didn't.

Someone noticed that throwing a rock at it chips the stone away. (Or noticed that throwing leaves don't do much at all.) Each trial further evolves their logical narrative. They don't need to know how something works, just that it works.

(It works because of abstract reasons rather than physical ones, but that's an other post entirely.)

When we are children we see adults do things that make sense (as we see how it's done). This way, we don't have to spend so much time developing the logic for our experience.

An athlete may suddenly break a new record. Other athletes see this and extend their own logic. Suddenly, many other athletes are able to do the same thing that was previously not a part of the logic-field.

We can use English to "control" others to knock down the wall on a construction site but talking to the wall directly doesn't seem to work. That isn't to say that it could never work, just that the experience is a part of our logical landscape yet. (But if someone, somehow, manages to do just that, our logical landscape will change because of it. Then it will be closer to our own experience.)

For example, we could easily develop telepathic communication by starting from the kind of telepathic communication that works now, such as the sense of knowing when someone is looking at you. So, rather than first trying to do something that isn't close to our experience we do something that is, in order that we can evolve telepathic communication with words later. (Same as how the ancient humans, in the example above, knew that rocks were more logical at changing the state of the wall than were leaves.)

The X model is one such thing that makes certain kinds of experiences more relative to you (via extended logic) than others.

Other models are all around you, but they may not be effective for the kinds of things that we're talking about.

For example, we could possibly get to a distant planet in a rocket ship but it would be so inefficient as to be not worth the effort. It may be more effective to use other tools more logical to the desired experience to accomplish the task.

X is one such tool out of many that are developed in future.