To clarify!
X holds that everything in the universe is one of four types of elements. They are:
:Structure - measurement, rules, definitions, guidelines, hierarchy, framework, linear order, particles
::Potential energy - trust, emotions, fuel or energy, capital, incentives, or anything used for its capacity or space
:::Interaction - association, conversation, sitting, playing, being in a relationship, competing, walking, chaos, waves, gravity, consciousness
::::Representation - names, symbols, dates, photos, models, souvenirs and keepsakes, portfolio assets, people, matter, perception
You can say that an X model simply provides a map to where you want to experience.
Instead of two axes (X,Y) on a map we have 4 (the elements above)
Generating a model simply provides the coordinates to how to get there from where you are.
On a map the closer you are to your destination the sooner you may get there.
In Ecsys the more relative your perspective is to what you are changing it to the sooner you will experience it. (Time is all about relativity.)
Basically, there are 4 steps (in no particular order):
We interact with the desired perspective before we 'get there' in order to make it more relative to us.
In order to do that, we find a way to represent the desired perspective in our current perspective (in any way whatsoever).
We develop structure around the whole thing in order to focus the desired perspective.
We use potential energy in order to be open to the possibilities resulting from the process.
Anything you can possibly imagine can be experienced using these 4 steps, as anything you can possibly imagine is one or a combination of the X elements.
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
A Few Words...
There will always be drama.
Attraction and repulsion is the nature of consciousness.
The problem arises when we think attraction and repulsion are two separate forces.
We may think that we're not attracted to the things we seem to hate, for example.
I'm suggesting that at times it may better suit us to know the extent of our own perceptions.
If we see lies, for example, we could think, "why do I feel that way?"
It is easy to get confused and think that we are our own focal point.
Our body is most relative to what we are, and it is us. But we often fail to see that what we are includes the entirety of our perceptions not just the most relative area (our body).
To embrace everything that we perceive is the difficult part. But parting our perceptions into good and bad creates an illusion quite difficult to embrace.
Attraction and repulsion is the nature of consciousness.
The problem arises when we think attraction and repulsion are two separate forces.
We may think that we're not attracted to the things we seem to hate, for example.
I'm suggesting that at times it may better suit us to know the extent of our own perceptions.
If we see lies, for example, we could think, "why do I feel that way?"
It is easy to get confused and think that we are our own focal point.
Our body is most relative to what we are, and it is us. But we often fail to see that what we are includes the entirety of our perceptions not just the most relative area (our body).
To embrace everything that we perceive is the difficult part. But parting our perceptions into good and bad creates an illusion quite difficult to embrace.
Shifting Relativity of Variables In Our Field of Existence
Is it possible to control the variables using the X model?
It's possible to control the variables using many other models, too. However, it's more of a change of our own personal logic than "control".
To affect change, the tools we use need to be logical to our experience. (In fact, we develop and use the tools in order that our own logic may be illustrated.)
For example, ancient humans may have seen a stone wall and danced around it in order to bring it down. Depending upon their particular group-logic, some methods would have worked while others didn't.
Someone noticed that throwing a rock at it chips the stone away. (Or noticed that throwing leaves don't do much at all.) Each trial further evolves their logical narrative. They don't need to know how something works, just that it works.
(It works because of abstract reasons rather than physical ones, but that's an other post entirely.)
When we are children we see adults do things that make sense (as we see how it's done). This way, we don't have to spend so much time developing the logic for our experience.
An athlete may suddenly break a new record. Other athletes see this and extend their own logic. Suddenly, many other athletes are able to do the same thing that was previously not a part of the logic-field.
We can use English to "control" others to knock down the wall on a construction site but talking to the wall directly doesn't seem to work. That isn't to say that it could never work, just that the experience is a part of our logical landscape yet. (But if someone, somehow, manages to do just that, our logical landscape will change because of it. Then it will be closer to our own experience.)
For example, we could easily develop telepathic communication by starting from the kind of telepathic communication that works now, such as the sense of knowing when someone is looking at you. So, rather than first trying to do something that isn't close to our experience we do something that is, in order that we can evolve telepathic communication with words later. (Same as how the ancient humans, in the example above, knew that rocks were more logical at changing the state of the wall than were leaves.)
The X model is one such thing that makes certain kinds of experiences more relative to you (via extended logic) than others.
Other models are all around you, but they may not be effective for the kinds of things that we're talking about.
For example, we could possibly get to a distant planet in a rocket ship but it would be so inefficient as to be not worth the effort. It may be more effective to use other tools more logical to the desired experience to accomplish the task.
X is one such tool out of many that are developed in future.
It's possible to control the variables using many other models, too. However, it's more of a change of our own personal logic than "control".
To affect change, the tools we use need to be logical to our experience. (In fact, we develop and use the tools in order that our own logic may be illustrated.)
For example, ancient humans may have seen a stone wall and danced around it in order to bring it down. Depending upon their particular group-logic, some methods would have worked while others didn't.
Someone noticed that throwing a rock at it chips the stone away. (Or noticed that throwing leaves don't do much at all.) Each trial further evolves their logical narrative. They don't need to know how something works, just that it works.
(It works because of abstract reasons rather than physical ones, but that's an other post entirely.)
When we are children we see adults do things that make sense (as we see how it's done). This way, we don't have to spend so much time developing the logic for our experience.
An athlete may suddenly break a new record. Other athletes see this and extend their own logic. Suddenly, many other athletes are able to do the same thing that was previously not a part of the logic-field.
We can use English to "control" others to knock down the wall on a construction site but talking to the wall directly doesn't seem to work. That isn't to say that it could never work, just that the experience is a part of our logical landscape yet. (But if someone, somehow, manages to do just that, our logical landscape will change because of it. Then it will be closer to our own experience.)
For example, we could easily develop telepathic communication by starting from the kind of telepathic communication that works now, such as the sense of knowing when someone is looking at you. So, rather than first trying to do something that isn't close to our experience we do something that is, in order that we can evolve telepathic communication with words later. (Same as how the ancient humans, in the example above, knew that rocks were more logical at changing the state of the wall than were leaves.)
The X model is one such thing that makes certain kinds of experiences more relative to you (via extended logic) than others.
Other models are all around you, but they may not be effective for the kinds of things that we're talking about.
For example, we could possibly get to a distant planet in a rocket ship but it would be so inefficient as to be not worth the effort. It may be more effective to use other tools more logical to the desired experience to accomplish the task.
X is one such tool out of many that are developed in future.
Monday, October 14, 2013
Another Thought Experiment
Greetings!
A thought experiment. On how life works.
Imagine that you are outside in the park. There are many people around you doing various activities. You see a group of people playing football nearby. However, there is also a strange phenomena occurring on the field. Some of the persons playing football you know, and some you don't. The ones that you don't know seem to be moving at a very high speed in the field. Your acquaintances are moving much slower than the strangers, and your friends are moving even slower than your acquaintances. Both your best friend and your brother are also playing football, but when you observe them it seems as though they are moving at an extremely slow pace.
During half-time you go over to talk to your brother. He is talking to one of the strangers whom you observed moving very rapidly on the field. He introduces you both and you begin to chat. You find out that you and your new acquaintance work at the same company as you, and begin chatting about it before the game begins again.
When half-time is over, you observe the new acquaintance moving a lot slower than he did before half-time. His friend that you saw him talk to during half-time is still moving fast but slightly slower than he did previously.
This is an illustration of how relativity works around us.
Some things are very relative to our experience and so seem to "last longer" in our lives than others.
You may actually have two brothers. One that we see often and one that we hardly ever see. If may be that you saw both brothers equally when you were growing up but, inexplicably, one drifted away from your life at a certain point. At that time you and your soon-distant brother became less and less relative to each other. It could be that he became infected with a different family of bacteria than you did. Perhaps it was that he, growing up in rural Maine, had a girlfriend for a few months that was from Sweden and was infected with a different kind of bacteria than you and your brother were infected with. This new bacteria introduced itself into his biology each time they kissed, and he soon found himself thinking different kinds of thoughts than but a few months ago.
(You and your brother are not a singular consciousness but a collection of an endless variety of consciousnesses in a constant stream of interaction. Only a small serving of "you" is actually of human biology.)
Our physical body's "clock" is slowed down throughout our lives. We seem to have pretty much the same face that we've always had, while clouds and people drift in and out of our lives. We pass some strangers on the street without noticing them while other strangers become friends.
We have an innate sense for relativity (as our "body" is actually everything we perceive) and are in a constant state of "balancing" between what is relative to us at that moment and what is not. We seem to be moving through space and time because of this shifting balance, when any physical motion is, instead, abstract motion.
We illustrate the sudden lack of relativity of a person, place, or a thing, in our own logical narrative. A person cannot just disappear when it becomes much less relative. Depending on our own logic, they must develop an illness and die if they slowly become less relative. If their being becomes rapidly and vastly different from ours (perhaps because of a new bacterium or idea they had) then perhaps they die suddenly in an accident or move to an other country.
Our experience is determined exclusively by the shifting relativity of variables in our field of existence.
To add!
Importantly, it can be realized that, for example, if you have 1 bad apple in a bunch and want to get rid of the "bad apple" in your life it may not do much good to make that 1 apple irrelevant, as it probably has changed the dynamics of the "good apples" around it.
What is one to do?
Realize that beings and things contain a multitude of other things within it, and each is in constant balance with its surroundings.
You are not just one consciousness, but an unimaginable number of consciousnesses all doing different things. And so is the apple.
The 1 apparently bad apple may have "infected" the others according to how relative its actions were to the other apples.
You may want to quit smoking, for example, and destroy your cigarettes. But your entire closet (and maybe home) is also "smoking" and, thus, it is still relative to your experience. Bits of cigarette-ness may still exist all around you.
You may remember a single sentence someone said 20 years ago but not remember anything else they said. In a way, that sentence is now a part of your being much the same way your own words are.
To illustrate this process, you can say that if you truly want to forget about something you should also forget the other things that still remember it (and those things that you still desire that you think have nothing to do with what you don't want).
A thought experiment. On how life works.
Imagine that you are outside in the park. There are many people around you doing various activities. You see a group of people playing football nearby. However, there is also a strange phenomena occurring on the field. Some of the persons playing football you know, and some you don't. The ones that you don't know seem to be moving at a very high speed in the field. Your acquaintances are moving much slower than the strangers, and your friends are moving even slower than your acquaintances. Both your best friend and your brother are also playing football, but when you observe them it seems as though they are moving at an extremely slow pace.
During half-time you go over to talk to your brother. He is talking to one of the strangers whom you observed moving very rapidly on the field. He introduces you both and you begin to chat. You find out that you and your new acquaintance work at the same company as you, and begin chatting about it before the game begins again.
When half-time is over, you observe the new acquaintance moving a lot slower than he did before half-time. His friend that you saw him talk to during half-time is still moving fast but slightly slower than he did previously.
This is an illustration of how relativity works around us.
Some things are very relative to our experience and so seem to "last longer" in our lives than others.
You may actually have two brothers. One that we see often and one that we hardly ever see. If may be that you saw both brothers equally when you were growing up but, inexplicably, one drifted away from your life at a certain point. At that time you and your soon-distant brother became less and less relative to each other. It could be that he became infected with a different family of bacteria than you did. Perhaps it was that he, growing up in rural Maine, had a girlfriend for a few months that was from Sweden and was infected with a different kind of bacteria than you and your brother were infected with. This new bacteria introduced itself into his biology each time they kissed, and he soon found himself thinking different kinds of thoughts than but a few months ago.
(You and your brother are not a singular consciousness but a collection of an endless variety of consciousnesses in a constant stream of interaction. Only a small serving of "you" is actually of human biology.)
Our physical body's "clock" is slowed down throughout our lives. We seem to have pretty much the same face that we've always had, while clouds and people drift in and out of our lives. We pass some strangers on the street without noticing them while other strangers become friends.
We have an innate sense for relativity (as our "body" is actually everything we perceive) and are in a constant state of "balancing" between what is relative to us at that moment and what is not. We seem to be moving through space and time because of this shifting balance, when any physical motion is, instead, abstract motion.
We illustrate the sudden lack of relativity of a person, place, or a thing, in our own logical narrative. A person cannot just disappear when it becomes much less relative. Depending on our own logic, they must develop an illness and die if they slowly become less relative. If their being becomes rapidly and vastly different from ours (perhaps because of a new bacterium or idea they had) then perhaps they die suddenly in an accident or move to an other country.
Our experience is determined exclusively by the shifting relativity of variables in our field of existence.
To add!
Importantly, it can be realized that, for example, if you have 1 bad apple in a bunch and want to get rid of the "bad apple" in your life it may not do much good to make that 1 apple irrelevant, as it probably has changed the dynamics of the "good apples" around it.
What is one to do?
Realize that beings and things contain a multitude of other things within it, and each is in constant balance with its surroundings.
You are not just one consciousness, but an unimaginable number of consciousnesses all doing different things. And so is the apple.
The 1 apparently bad apple may have "infected" the others according to how relative its actions were to the other apples.
You may want to quit smoking, for example, and destroy your cigarettes. But your entire closet (and maybe home) is also "smoking" and, thus, it is still relative to your experience. Bits of cigarette-ness may still exist all around you.
You may remember a single sentence someone said 20 years ago but not remember anything else they said. In a way, that sentence is now a part of your being much the same way your own words are.
To illustrate this process, you can say that if you truly want to forget about something you should also forget the other things that still remember it (and those things that you still desire that you think have nothing to do with what you don't want).
A Thought Experiment (if i may)
Greetings!
If I may, a thought experiment.
Imagine that each probability that exists is a pathway.
There are many different types of pathways such as hallways, walkways and corridors, alleyways, midways, streets and avenues, broadways, highways, etc.
So, we have different "sizes" of probabilities. Some probabilities are more related to other probabilities so thus become "larger" as more things travel on them. A road can become a highway as more cars travel on it, for example.
Further, each probability can connect with any other probability. Any two or more pathways can connect, forming a "nexus of probabilities".
The more probabilities that connect, the larger the nexus is and the easier it is to travel. (Because the more probabilities that interact with it, the more relative it is to the probability you are experiencing. This enables you to not only walk down the street and have different things happen but also to travel in space time (as long as where you are going is relative to where you are most experienced).)
There are representations of this in outer space that you sometimes call 'black holes' and sometimes call other things. These 'black holes' exist everywhere to some degree. The larger the black hole, so to speak, the more relative it is to that which meets it.
You can see less relative representations of these nexi in physical places like street corners. Some corners (and the areas surrounding them) will be good for business or social exchanges, for example. Usually, the greater this metaphysical nexus is the greater the physical pathway becomes. Thus, we have cities, families, ideas, encounters, etc., all illustrating their shrinking or growing metaphysical nexus.
You can think of the center of a galaxy as a combining of probabilities both literally and figuratively. But these 'black holes' can also be found in your body and time/space, and everywhere else.
It's simply the force of attraction/repulsion (the element Chaon in Xsys).
Here's the interesting part. When probabilities comprising a nexus are being added at a substantial rate (and, thus, becoming 'too big' for itself) the probabilities will usually clump together and taper off the nexus. At this point it will continue to 'add to' a smaller nexus.
Our worlds began to diverge just before your industrial revolution (and what would have been the time of our industrial revolution).
A few hundred years ago there were many probabilities comprising this nexus. The feedback and feed forward of the concepts and activities surrounding the industrial revolution eventually enabled the poly furcation of these probabilities.
Thus, there are now *many* worlds just like your own that are at their own stages of development, all having substantially diverged from yours nearly 300 hundred years ago.
Most likely there will soon be a scientific breakthrough in your world that will enable development of "warp drive" based not on traversing physical space but utilizing these ever-present nexus points to combine the "here" with the "there".
It is no different than experiencing a smell by using memory to recall a smell from 10 years ago rather than recreating the same smell in the present. Not using memory (a "black hole") will eventually sound as ridiculous to you as using rocket fuel to reach the moon. You already connect to non-physical worlds on a smaller scale (such as with intuition, or even sight/sound). You just don't realize how real these experiences are yet.
When we use a computer, for example, it is not that we are interacting with a separate physical object to perform tasks. The physical object is simply a (non-physical) representation of a miniature solar system of concepts. The computer is no more real that the word or even the thought of it. You've developed these representations in order to do something you could not otherwise do.
We can use our minds to add 1+1, or we can use a calculator.
Eventually (probably) you will be able to connect to a massive network using your mind instead of computer hardware. The "physical" representations you use now to perform these non-physical tasks is just so that the concepts and tools can be formed internally.
It is similar to you, as a baby, trying to verbalize words using your vocal cords in order to be able to *think* in a new way and do things you could not previously do.
So when you're looking at a physical object you're looking at a 'black hole'. Other things have combined together in a nexus of probabilities. In one probability the chair is a lake, in the other the lake is a chair. You can "get to the lake from the chair", so to speak.
When this world realizes that physical distance (and distance in time) is not absolute then we will begin to do things that science fiction hasn't even come up with yet. Things that I cannot even begin to explain.
This is most likely to occur after the current period, when it is realized the 'changes' most of us have envisioned would occur (for example, with 2012) are representations of non-physical changes. Like a dream.
It all begins with Representation.
If I may, a thought experiment.
Imagine that each probability that exists is a pathway.
There are many different types of pathways such as hallways, walkways and corridors, alleyways, midways, streets and avenues, broadways, highways, etc.
So, we have different "sizes" of probabilities. Some probabilities are more related to other probabilities so thus become "larger" as more things travel on them. A road can become a highway as more cars travel on it, for example.
Further, each probability can connect with any other probability. Any two or more pathways can connect, forming a "nexus of probabilities".
The more probabilities that connect, the larger the nexus is and the easier it is to travel. (Because the more probabilities that interact with it, the more relative it is to the probability you are experiencing. This enables you to not only walk down the street and have different things happen but also to travel in space time (as long as where you are going is relative to where you are most experienced).)
There are representations of this in outer space that you sometimes call 'black holes' and sometimes call other things. These 'black holes' exist everywhere to some degree. The larger the black hole, so to speak, the more relative it is to that which meets it.
You can see less relative representations of these nexi in physical places like street corners. Some corners (and the areas surrounding them) will be good for business or social exchanges, for example. Usually, the greater this metaphysical nexus is the greater the physical pathway becomes. Thus, we have cities, families, ideas, encounters, etc., all illustrating their shrinking or growing metaphysical nexus.
You can think of the center of a galaxy as a combining of probabilities both literally and figuratively. But these 'black holes' can also be found in your body and time/space, and everywhere else.
It's simply the force of attraction/repulsion (the element Chaon in Xsys).
Here's the interesting part. When probabilities comprising a nexus are being added at a substantial rate (and, thus, becoming 'too big' for itself) the probabilities will usually clump together and taper off the nexus. At this point it will continue to 'add to' a smaller nexus.
Our worlds began to diverge just before your industrial revolution (and what would have been the time of our industrial revolution).
A few hundred years ago there were many probabilities comprising this nexus. The feedback and feed forward of the concepts and activities surrounding the industrial revolution eventually enabled the poly furcation of these probabilities.
Thus, there are now *many* worlds just like your own that are at their own stages of development, all having substantially diverged from yours nearly 300 hundred years ago.
Most likely there will soon be a scientific breakthrough in your world that will enable development of "warp drive" based not on traversing physical space but utilizing these ever-present nexus points to combine the "here" with the "there".
It is no different than experiencing a smell by using memory to recall a smell from 10 years ago rather than recreating the same smell in the present. Not using memory (a "black hole") will eventually sound as ridiculous to you as using rocket fuel to reach the moon. You already connect to non-physical worlds on a smaller scale (such as with intuition, or even sight/sound). You just don't realize how real these experiences are yet.
When we use a computer, for example, it is not that we are interacting with a separate physical object to perform tasks. The physical object is simply a (non-physical) representation of a miniature solar system of concepts. The computer is no more real that the word or even the thought of it. You've developed these representations in order to do something you could not otherwise do.
We can use our minds to add 1+1, or we can use a calculator.
Eventually (probably) you will be able to connect to a massive network using your mind instead of computer hardware. The "physical" representations you use now to perform these non-physical tasks is just so that the concepts and tools can be formed internally.
It is similar to you, as a baby, trying to verbalize words using your vocal cords in order to be able to *think* in a new way and do things you could not previously do.
So when you're looking at a physical object you're looking at a 'black hole'. Other things have combined together in a nexus of probabilities. In one probability the chair is a lake, in the other the lake is a chair. You can "get to the lake from the chair", so to speak.
When this world realizes that physical distance (and distance in time) is not absolute then we will begin to do things that science fiction hasn't even come up with yet. Things that I cannot even begin to explain.
This is most likely to occur after the current period, when it is realized the 'changes' most of us have envisioned would occur (for example, with 2012) are representations of non-physical changes. Like a dream.
It all begins with Representation.
How To Alter Your Universe
Some of you may be wondering, "Well, how do I alter my universe?"
Allow me to illustrate the way I do this by first explaining how *you* do this already. [This is Part 1. A little something before I may go.]
When you drift off into sleep you are altering your perspective.
It may seem as though your conscious mind is changing from being awake to being asleep, from A state to B state. Let's exemplify this and say your 'bodily perspective' is like a car, the 2013 Consciousness X. You may think you are driving this car across one state to an other, transitioning steadily off into sleep.
What happens, instead, is that at the moment you're driving the Consciousness X and decide to go to Sleepyland you jump out of the car and into another car, the Consciousness XI. This car is on a different path, towards Sleepyland and all the wonderful magic it offers.
Amazingly, when you decide to jump out you notice the Consciousness X is still driving! That's because a car must always have a driver. A perspective (the car) and consciousness is the same thing.
So the Consciousness X continues down its path of bodily awareness while the Consciousness XI goes in another direction.
Every possibility exists. Why? Because the 'goal' of existence is to create relationships with everything. The more relationships there are, the more consciousness there is. The more consciousness there is the fuller its perspective and the "closer" it is to perceiving the entirety of itself (although there is no distance, only perspective, and perceiving itself fully is impossible).
(We experience those possibilities which are most relative to our experience. If you choose door A instead of door B your perspective will experience door A but another perspective will experience door B. You don't remember door B because it is no longer relative to your experience. The possibility of feeling the handle of door A and walking through it *is* most relative, so that is what you experience. Make door B relative and you can experience that, too. You might call this being psychic. But it's just using perspective.)
You still have all of your senses (plus thought) in your Consciousness X. All of your devices and wiring still works just as a car should. In actuality, Consciousness X is *not* in the dream state. This means that you are *not* in another state of mind when you are sleeping. Technically, you are *always* in Consciousness X.
You can expand your idea of what you consider "you" to include other perspectives. You do this already when you say that you had a dream. It was your dream, right? But when you momentarily perceive another perspective in your waking reality you usually don't say that you were back 20 years ago standing in your kitchen (result: a particular smell "suddenly" coming to you). You just say you had a vivid memory of some past event.
But in reality, you've experienced another you. (And made it relative to your waking experience so that you can remember it. You can do this by creating representations for the dream events, or vice versa.)
We can experience these perspectives all the time. We just have to make it relative to our current experience. We make the dreaming perspective relative to our waking experience by coming up with a structure (sleeping patterns), having representations of sleep (bed, sheets, closed eyes, etc), potential energy (thoughts), and interacting with those elements. We sleep, in effect, because we have established a model for sleep.
It is about the same method that I use. Except the different way that we use it in my world enables us to have different perspectives. We have models for shifting our perspective of time, models for shifting our perspective of the world we live in, and others.
I am here in what I call an alternate universe (though it is really the same universe) and experiencing your world *because* I have a model for it. There was a time in humanity that our perspective was only dreaming. There was a time that we had no dreams to remember. Some of us have never remembered a dream at all. In your future you will also have the same "model for experiencing alternate realms" that I am using.
Imagine traveling to a remote, undiscovered, civilization in the jungles of Peru and finding out that they are unable to dream. You tell them how you are able to lay down, close your eyes and shift your perspective, experiencing just about anything you can imagine. You explain to them that it's not magic. They just need to follow the same model and change their cognitive framework to include such things. They'd definitely think you're nuts and wouldn't even begin to be able to understand how it's possible, but it sure does sound fascinating.
But it's what you're doing already.
The only difference is that where I come from we've learned how to 1) make our waking experience relative to the place we want to go. Mainly so that we can both remember it and use the same kind of perspective when we get there (ie., take our mind with us); and 2) decide where we want to go.
You've not learned #1 and #2 because you don't have the proper tool. This tool that we use is Xsys.
When you are dreaming and the dream suddenly transitions to another, the first dream continues on about its path. You don't experience this because your have only 1 perspective. (You can expand your perspective to experience both realms the same way you've expanded your perspective to include all your bodily realms, but that's perhaps another post).
Similarly, when you begin the dream you'll notice the dream has already begun. It was there in full before you were aware of it. That's because although you have shifted your perspective to it, it was already a world of its own.
And so here I am in your world. Everything was here already. But I have shifted my perspective. I live in 2013, but I live in a different world.
So what does it mean that you remember that you went to sleep? It is the memory of you jumping out of the car and being able to track the other car on the GPS. Although you don't really remember your dream from the dream perspective (as the two cars took different paths and you didn't see what you could have seen in Consciousness XI) you can see the map of your experience. Your GPS has different software, and allows you to see representations of the other car and location on its screen. When you look at the map and view the route Conscious XI took, you call it your "dream". You remember something about it because the car is the same model and year. You see other cars on the road but you tend to ignore them and only remember seeing cars that were exactly like yours. You remember and perceive that which is relative to you. (The same way your senses/brain ignore greater than 99% of your current reality.)
You may be thinking that your dream is just a dream. Of course you do because the perspectives are different. (Is that other 1% of your reality that you ignore also a dream?) When you are dreaming how invalid do you think your dreams are? They are in fact so real that you seem to dream for hours. Some of us don't even want to wake up! But your dream world isn't the same kind of physically-oriented world as you know it. Some dreams are physical, indeed (but on a different wavelength of what would be called physicality). They may even have an effect on your sleeping body. Some dreams are not physical at all. But all dreams are real. And all reality does not exist in your dreams. But dreams are a way for you to shift your perspective.
I get to your world not by dreaming but by being very much awake, using the language of X. One day, too, you will "dream while waking" the same way you "think deeply while waking", which is not something humanity has always been able to do. No, this would not be a hallucination that overloads the already-strained senses. It will be your expanded perspective.
Part 2 will explain how you can use X to do the same thing.
(In the example above, notice how I created representations for the concepts using metaphors. The metaphors allowed you to, hopefully, perceive the concepts more clearly. This is what X does. By creating representations you can perceive. By manipulating the relationships you can change your perspective.)
Allow me to illustrate the way I do this by first explaining how *you* do this already. [This is Part 1. A little something before I may go.]
When you drift off into sleep you are altering your perspective.
It may seem as though your conscious mind is changing from being awake to being asleep, from A state to B state. Let's exemplify this and say your 'bodily perspective' is like a car, the 2013 Consciousness X. You may think you are driving this car across one state to an other, transitioning steadily off into sleep.
What happens, instead, is that at the moment you're driving the Consciousness X and decide to go to Sleepyland you jump out of the car and into another car, the Consciousness XI. This car is on a different path, towards Sleepyland and all the wonderful magic it offers.
Amazingly, when you decide to jump out you notice the Consciousness X is still driving! That's because a car must always have a driver. A perspective (the car) and consciousness is the same thing.
So the Consciousness X continues down its path of bodily awareness while the Consciousness XI goes in another direction.
Every possibility exists. Why? Because the 'goal' of existence is to create relationships with everything. The more relationships there are, the more consciousness there is. The more consciousness there is the fuller its perspective and the "closer" it is to perceiving the entirety of itself (although there is no distance, only perspective, and perceiving itself fully is impossible).
(We experience those possibilities which are most relative to our experience. If you choose door A instead of door B your perspective will experience door A but another perspective will experience door B. You don't remember door B because it is no longer relative to your experience. The possibility of feeling the handle of door A and walking through it *is* most relative, so that is what you experience. Make door B relative and you can experience that, too. You might call this being psychic. But it's just using perspective.)
You still have all of your senses (plus thought) in your Consciousness X. All of your devices and wiring still works just as a car should. In actuality, Consciousness X is *not* in the dream state. This means that you are *not* in another state of mind when you are sleeping. Technically, you are *always* in Consciousness X.
You can expand your idea of what you consider "you" to include other perspectives. You do this already when you say that you had a dream. It was your dream, right? But when you momentarily perceive another perspective in your waking reality you usually don't say that you were back 20 years ago standing in your kitchen (result: a particular smell "suddenly" coming to you). You just say you had a vivid memory of some past event.
But in reality, you've experienced another you. (And made it relative to your waking experience so that you can remember it. You can do this by creating representations for the dream events, or vice versa.)
We can experience these perspectives all the time. We just have to make it relative to our current experience. We make the dreaming perspective relative to our waking experience by coming up with a structure (sleeping patterns), having representations of sleep (bed, sheets, closed eyes, etc), potential energy (thoughts), and interacting with those elements. We sleep, in effect, because we have established a model for sleep.
It is about the same method that I use. Except the different way that we use it in my world enables us to have different perspectives. We have models for shifting our perspective of time, models for shifting our perspective of the world we live in, and others.
I am here in what I call an alternate universe (though it is really the same universe) and experiencing your world *because* I have a model for it. There was a time in humanity that our perspective was only dreaming. There was a time that we had no dreams to remember. Some of us have never remembered a dream at all. In your future you will also have the same "model for experiencing alternate realms" that I am using.
Imagine traveling to a remote, undiscovered, civilization in the jungles of Peru and finding out that they are unable to dream. You tell them how you are able to lay down, close your eyes and shift your perspective, experiencing just about anything you can imagine. You explain to them that it's not magic. They just need to follow the same model and change their cognitive framework to include such things. They'd definitely think you're nuts and wouldn't even begin to be able to understand how it's possible, but it sure does sound fascinating.
But it's what you're doing already.
The only difference is that where I come from we've learned how to 1) make our waking experience relative to the place we want to go. Mainly so that we can both remember it and use the same kind of perspective when we get there (ie., take our mind with us); and 2) decide where we want to go.
You've not learned #1 and #2 because you don't have the proper tool. This tool that we use is Xsys.
When you are dreaming and the dream suddenly transitions to another, the first dream continues on about its path. You don't experience this because your have only 1 perspective. (You can expand your perspective to experience both realms the same way you've expanded your perspective to include all your bodily realms, but that's perhaps another post).
Similarly, when you begin the dream you'll notice the dream has already begun. It was there in full before you were aware of it. That's because although you have shifted your perspective to it, it was already a world of its own.
And so here I am in your world. Everything was here already. But I have shifted my perspective. I live in 2013, but I live in a different world.
So what does it mean that you remember that you went to sleep? It is the memory of you jumping out of the car and being able to track the other car on the GPS. Although you don't really remember your dream from the dream perspective (as the two cars took different paths and you didn't see what you could have seen in Consciousness XI) you can see the map of your experience. Your GPS has different software, and allows you to see representations of the other car and location on its screen. When you look at the map and view the route Conscious XI took, you call it your "dream". You remember something about it because the car is the same model and year. You see other cars on the road but you tend to ignore them and only remember seeing cars that were exactly like yours. You remember and perceive that which is relative to you. (The same way your senses/brain ignore greater than 99% of your current reality.)
You may be thinking that your dream is just a dream. Of course you do because the perspectives are different. (Is that other 1% of your reality that you ignore also a dream?) When you are dreaming how invalid do you think your dreams are? They are in fact so real that you seem to dream for hours. Some of us don't even want to wake up! But your dream world isn't the same kind of physically-oriented world as you know it. Some dreams are physical, indeed (but on a different wavelength of what would be called physicality). They may even have an effect on your sleeping body. Some dreams are not physical at all. But all dreams are real. And all reality does not exist in your dreams. But dreams are a way for you to shift your perspective.
I get to your world not by dreaming but by being very much awake, using the language of X. One day, too, you will "dream while waking" the same way you "think deeply while waking", which is not something humanity has always been able to do. No, this would not be a hallucination that overloads the already-strained senses. It will be your expanded perspective.
Part 2 will explain how you can use X to do the same thing.
(In the example above, notice how I created representations for the concepts using metaphors. The metaphors allowed you to, hopefully, perceive the concepts more clearly. This is what X does. By creating representations you can perceive. By manipulating the relationships you can change your perspective.)
Representations
To change your reality you would make changes to the representations in it.
Your perspective (or, "consciousness" if you will) comes about from the all the relationships combined from your particular vantage point, you could say.
Yes, it would be gradual. What we are experiencing with time is not an absolute chronological progression but a kind of psychological (or cognitive) progression.
We experience that which is most relative to us. Sometimes it's called past sometimes it's called future. When something is distant from our immediate relationships we call it "way over there" or "past".
Perspective is automatic and a result of the relationships of the representations.
Think of a "relationship" (as the term is here used) in the following example:
You have two opposing magnets. Each magnet is a representation.
The repulsive force between the two magnets is PERSPECTIVE. Otherwise known as consciousness.
The consciousness comes about because of the relationship between the two representations.
Now imagine that one magnet is you and the other magnet is an apple pie.
The more you interact with this other representation the more "you + apple pie" consciousness you are creating. The result will be another consciousness (maybe you adding more fat to your body). The result is the 'square' of the you and apple pie representations.
Your perspective (or, "consciousness" if you will) comes about from the all the relationships combined from your particular vantage point, you could say.
Yes, it would be gradual. What we are experiencing with time is not an absolute chronological progression but a kind of psychological (or cognitive) progression.
We experience that which is most relative to us. Sometimes it's called past sometimes it's called future. When something is distant from our immediate relationships we call it "way over there" or "past".
Perspective is automatic and a result of the relationships of the representations.
Think of a "relationship" (as the term is here used) in the following example:
You have two opposing magnets. Each magnet is a representation.
The repulsive force between the two magnets is PERSPECTIVE. Otherwise known as consciousness.
The consciousness comes about because of the relationship between the two representations.
Now imagine that one magnet is you and the other magnet is an apple pie.
The more you interact with this other representation the more "you + apple pie" consciousness you are creating. The result will be another consciousness (maybe you adding more fat to your body). The result is the 'square' of the you and apple pie representations.
Perceptions
How does one consciously alter perspectives?
There's no easy way to explain it, but it can be done by changing representations.
Representations surround you. Everything you see is a representation of something else.
So, you could say that by doing something different with a representation you are changing the relationship and, thus, the resultant perspective.
For example, let's say you were living in poor conditions and wanted to move into a nicer place.
Take a look at the representations around you. What things do you perceive (through all of your 5 senses + your thoughts) that make you feel as though the conditions were not suitable?
It could be that you live in a poor neighbourhood with lots of boarded-up homes. Your house is somewhat dilapidated and there is little hot water. But for now let's focus on your immediate environment, like your bedroom or where you spend most of your time in the house.
It could be that you have a broken handle on your bedroom door, an unsightly hole in the wall in the hallway, and old stairs. There are many more conditions about your house, of course, but let's keep ourselves to these three.
Each of these three would represent the conditions you find yourself in. (They form a sort of consciousness.) Your experience is not so much "because" you lost your job several years ago and have a family to support, but is more because you have allowed the representations to interact more and more over time and do so within your environment. It is more about the relationships you have in the now (and here) than in the past (or there). Maybe you remember the handle wasn't always broken. But when it broke you didn't care to fix it. This broken handle then began to interact with the other representations in the house making the complete picture seem more undesirable. (The broken handle slowly breaks its surroundings, so to speak.)
You would begin to change your perspective by making the representations appropriate to the an other state (say, a better living environment). Changing the representations (fixing the handle, taking care of the hole and the stairs) may not seem like the way to get you out of the house, but it is.
[Here's where English gets a bit tricky.. bear with me in the illustration]
When the relationships change you experience this change over time. You transition from one state to another much the same way you don't just appear in a dream but you transition by preparing for bed, putting on certain clothes or laying in a certain place, etc. It is possible to realize you are dreaming now (and we sometimes do, momentarily) but it is not something in our cognitive framework. You don't just go from one state to another. It's shocking. You need a logical transition.
So, even though a relationship may change more or less instantly it may take some time for you to perceive of the change in your physically-oriented environment.
(For many people here, this relationship transition period is about 2-3 months I think.)
It is not necessary to change your thoughts so much. Many of your thoughts have 'externalizations' that you can see. Changing a thought could be as easy as doing something physical. In the big scheme of things, there is little difference. (Do realize, however, that what is most relative to you is closest to you and your experience. Your body is most relative as are your thoughts. It is your close experience. But changing something else may trigger a new kind of relationship which may allow you, eventually, to perceive the kind of things you want.)
Sometimes we make the mistake of resisting the things around us. This usually doesn't work because you can't just "push a cup away". The cup is more than what you see. The cup could very much be tied to other things that you see or don't see.
A ready example would be Susan trying to leave a man that she knows isn't good for her. It is not as easy as physically leaving until she has changed more of the other relationships that she can't see, as well.
There's no easy way to explain it, but it can be done by changing representations.
Representations surround you. Everything you see is a representation of something else.
So, you could say that by doing something different with a representation you are changing the relationship and, thus, the resultant perspective.
For example, let's say you were living in poor conditions and wanted to move into a nicer place.
Take a look at the representations around you. What things do you perceive (through all of your 5 senses + your thoughts) that make you feel as though the conditions were not suitable?
It could be that you live in a poor neighbourhood with lots of boarded-up homes. Your house is somewhat dilapidated and there is little hot water. But for now let's focus on your immediate environment, like your bedroom or where you spend most of your time in the house.
It could be that you have a broken handle on your bedroom door, an unsightly hole in the wall in the hallway, and old stairs. There are many more conditions about your house, of course, but let's keep ourselves to these three.
Each of these three would represent the conditions you find yourself in. (They form a sort of consciousness.) Your experience is not so much "because" you lost your job several years ago and have a family to support, but is more because you have allowed the representations to interact more and more over time and do so within your environment. It is more about the relationships you have in the now (and here) than in the past (or there). Maybe you remember the handle wasn't always broken. But when it broke you didn't care to fix it. This broken handle then began to interact with the other representations in the house making the complete picture seem more undesirable. (The broken handle slowly breaks its surroundings, so to speak.)
You would begin to change your perspective by making the representations appropriate to the an other state (say, a better living environment). Changing the representations (fixing the handle, taking care of the hole and the stairs) may not seem like the way to get you out of the house, but it is.
[Here's where English gets a bit tricky.. bear with me in the illustration]
When the relationships change you experience this change over time. You transition from one state to another much the same way you don't just appear in a dream but you transition by preparing for bed, putting on certain clothes or laying in a certain place, etc. It is possible to realize you are dreaming now (and we sometimes do, momentarily) but it is not something in our cognitive framework. You don't just go from one state to another. It's shocking. You need a logical transition.
So, even though a relationship may change more or less instantly it may take some time for you to perceive of the change in your physically-oriented environment.
(For many people here, this relationship transition period is about 2-3 months I think.)
It is not necessary to change your thoughts so much. Many of your thoughts have 'externalizations' that you can see. Changing a thought could be as easy as doing something physical. In the big scheme of things, there is little difference. (Do realize, however, that what is most relative to you is closest to you and your experience. Your body is most relative as are your thoughts. It is your close experience. But changing something else may trigger a new kind of relationship which may allow you, eventually, to perceive the kind of things you want.)
Sometimes we make the mistake of resisting the things around us. This usually doesn't work because you can't just "push a cup away". The cup is more than what you see. The cup could very much be tied to other things that you see or don't see.
A ready example would be Susan trying to leave a man that she knows isn't good for her. It is not as easy as physically leaving until she has changed more of the other relationships that she can't see, as well.
Deflect
How is it that we can perceive things that we do not agree with?
Let's take an example.
Why is it that you are doing Xie right now?
You probably don't know what I'm talking about because there is nothing to support Xie in this world.
When we have something that defines Xie then we can imagine all kinds of activities surrounding Xie. Good stuff, bad stuff, etc.
Further:
without the idea of time the... would be no clocks, as we could not imagine the usefulness of such a device.
without the idea of law enforcement there would be no one breaking the laws, because no one could imagine how the laws could be broken.
without the idea of certain religions there would be no sins, because no one could imagine how to sin as "sin" would not be defined.
A clock depends on time, a criminal depends on the law, sin depends on its religion, etc.
However, the opposite is also true. The existence of time depends on time-keeping mechanisms. The law depends on criminals to define it. Religion depends on sin and other aspects of its use in order that it may exist.
Each needs the other in order that it may be defined.
If you were to create a world from scratch and place in it only the "good" things then eventually some of those good things would then turn "bad" in your perception because you need a way to perceive of other things, i.e., to create relationships.
So, we are left with intentionally disagreeing with the things we perceive in order to define the things we do agree with.
[Note: The above is a very simplified explanation of the dependencies of perception. There are a multitude of other factors at play, but the idea is the same.]
Reflection
I often hear people talk about how they believe that they create their own reality but don't see how they create what they think of as the negative things.
Perhaps they think when their body gets sick, somehow they did not make it so.
That when they stub their toe, somehow it was the object's fault or they simply didn't see it.
It's not that these things are created in their reality. Or that they ...create their reality. Nothing is really created. But everything is perceived.
Creation doesn't exist. We use these terms to reference some other process.
If we write a poem, for example, we're not creating something new. We're simply exploring relationships. The words were already there but it becomes relevant to us because we are creating a poem for ourselves.
When something new happens, it is the same thing. You are exploring a relationship. The elements were there already but you are in a way "seeing what happens" when you combine one thing with another thing.
It doesn't actually matter what you perceive, as long as you perceive something.
The idea is to "form relationships". However, the value of each relationship is not the same as the perception of it.
In this sense, at times it may be "better" to perceive of something you consider very bad than something very good.
You're looking at the shape of the relationship, not what your brain interprets the relationship to look like today.
What do we perceive? We perceive of things most relative to us in the here/now. Things not as relative to us are more distant in time/space.
So, your body is most relative to your perspective. So it seems that it's always following you around. Your toes are not as relative to your perspective as your nose and mouth are, and are further away in distance.
Your watch is sometimes relative to your perspective so you may only wear it sometimes.
Your workplace is less relative to your perspective, so it is even more distant.
And so on...
However, it is about the value rather than the perception. The place you grew up or went to school may be very relative to your current perspective but be distant in time space. But what you don't see is that the "shape" of your school or hometown is still around you in a different form.
So, actually, when we are reading a scientific article about how we perceive we must ask ourselves, "What is it that we're doing?"
Are we reading an article or exploring our own values?
When we perceive of a distant object, is it that the photons from the object are hitting the cells in our eyes or that the distant object is us; a less-relative value in our perspective and we only interpret distance in such a way?
Perhaps they think when their body gets sick, somehow they did not make it so.
That when they stub their toe, somehow it was the object's fault or they simply didn't see it.
It's not that these things are created in their reality. Or that they ...create their reality. Nothing is really created. But everything is perceived.
Creation doesn't exist. We use these terms to reference some other process.
If we write a poem, for example, we're not creating something new. We're simply exploring relationships. The words were already there but it becomes relevant to us because we are creating a poem for ourselves.
When something new happens, it is the same thing. You are exploring a relationship. The elements were there already but you are in a way "seeing what happens" when you combine one thing with another thing.
It doesn't actually matter what you perceive, as long as you perceive something.
The idea is to "form relationships". However, the value of each relationship is not the same as the perception of it.
In this sense, at times it may be "better" to perceive of something you consider very bad than something very good.
You're looking at the shape of the relationship, not what your brain interprets the relationship to look like today.
What do we perceive? We perceive of things most relative to us in the here/now. Things not as relative to us are more distant in time/space.
So, your body is most relative to your perspective. So it seems that it's always following you around. Your toes are not as relative to your perspective as your nose and mouth are, and are further away in distance.
Your watch is sometimes relative to your perspective so you may only wear it sometimes.
Your workplace is less relative to your perspective, so it is even more distant.
And so on...
However, it is about the value rather than the perception. The place you grew up or went to school may be very relative to your current perspective but be distant in time space. But what you don't see is that the "shape" of your school or hometown is still around you in a different form.
So, actually, when we are reading a scientific article about how we perceive we must ask ourselves, "What is it that we're doing?"
Are we reading an article or exploring our own values?
When we perceive of a distant object, is it that the photons from the object are hitting the cells in our eyes or that the distant object is us; a less-relative value in our perspective and we only interpret distance in such a way?
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Become The Infin8
The easiest way to become non-physical (or, more accurately, to remember that you are not actually bound to physicality) is to practice what we call the Code of X.
There are 4 codes:
Code of ThohT
Make your thoughts and desires physical in a small way.
Symbolize your internal reality in your physical reality. No need to start out doing this every day. At first, try it once. Then see if you can understand how it works. A few days later, try it again. The point of this exercise is to slowly show yourself how you come to experience your reality.
Code of Chaos
Be honest with the people and things around you.
The more transparent you are the more you are connecting with your perceptions. You're not fooling your perceptions! The more honest you are with your own perceptions the quicker you can peer through the veil of reality to see how it really is. When you are dishonest with the things, places, people, etc, you perceive you are being dishonest with your own perceptions. Meaning, you are hiding from yourself. So then you don't actually want to see how things are. The point of this exercise is to realize that you are the same as what you perceive.
Code of Kosmosis
Explore what is outside of your usual perspective.
Do things you would not ordinarily do. Your reality fits your definition of it. If you say you are X and X is how things happen, then your perspective will grow into it as your reinforcing views take shape. Get out of your shell! Redefine your reality by being flexible not only about who and what you are but the world around you. When you open your mind to different possibilities you are expanding your perspective. Essentially you are slowly adopting the view that anything could be anything. The things you perceive become more unified and start to hold the same values.. it all becomes one thing: your perception. The point of this exercise is to realize that everything is in everything else
Code of Orbia
Respect the logic of others.
Try to understand whatever you resist. Exercise 'unlogic' by asking yourself, “How could I be wrong?” Things that many of us don't want to do: see the other side of the coin about our strongest beliefs. Start small. Make a list of some things you believe and try to see it for its opposite. This is not to say that you should start believing in the opposite of whatever your beliefs are. See the logic of the things you don't believe in. It may not make sense to you but it makes sense to somebody. Then ask yourself how you could be wrong about the things you believe in. Start small and work your way up to your core beliefs. The point of this exercise is to understand that there is not just one kind of logic or right answer. There are no right answers. Each answer is perfectly attuned to its complete environment, including your own answers and closely-held beliefs. 1+1 is not "2". It is irrelevant. It only matters when we value "1" in a particular way and see the world in a particular way. Does this mean that bad things are good? No, it means that the question of good and bad are irrelevant when we don't know how something really is. It's all your perception. If some of your perceptions are good while others are bad then it is difficult to see your reality as a single perspective.
There are 4 codes:
Code of ThohT
Make your thoughts and desires physical in a small way.
Symbolize your internal reality in your physical reality. No need to start out doing this every day. At first, try it once. Then see if you can understand how it works. A few days later, try it again. The point of this exercise is to slowly show yourself how you come to experience your reality.
Code of Chaos
Be honest with the people and things around you.
The more transparent you are the more you are connecting with your perceptions. You're not fooling your perceptions! The more honest you are with your own perceptions the quicker you can peer through the veil of reality to see how it really is. When you are dishonest with the things, places, people, etc, you perceive you are being dishonest with your own perceptions. Meaning, you are hiding from yourself. So then you don't actually want to see how things are. The point of this exercise is to realize that you are the same as what you perceive.
Code of Kosmosis
Explore what is outside of your usual perspective.
Do things you would not ordinarily do. Your reality fits your definition of it. If you say you are X and X is how things happen, then your perspective will grow into it as your reinforcing views take shape. Get out of your shell! Redefine your reality by being flexible not only about who and what you are but the world around you. When you open your mind to different possibilities you are expanding your perspective. Essentially you are slowly adopting the view that anything could be anything. The things you perceive become more unified and start to hold the same values.. it all becomes one thing: your perception. The point of this exercise is to realize that everything is in everything else
Code of Orbia
Respect the logic of others.
Try to understand whatever you resist. Exercise 'unlogic' by asking yourself, “How could I be wrong?” Things that many of us don't want to do: see the other side of the coin about our strongest beliefs. Start small. Make a list of some things you believe and try to see it for its opposite. This is not to say that you should start believing in the opposite of whatever your beliefs are. See the logic of the things you don't believe in. It may not make sense to you but it makes sense to somebody. Then ask yourself how you could be wrong about the things you believe in. Start small and work your way up to your core beliefs. The point of this exercise is to understand that there is not just one kind of logic or right answer. There are no right answers. Each answer is perfectly attuned to its complete environment, including your own answers and closely-held beliefs. 1+1 is not "2". It is irrelevant. It only matters when we value "1" in a particular way and see the world in a particular way. Does this mean that bad things are good? No, it means that the question of good and bad are irrelevant when we don't know how something really is. It's all your perception. If some of your perceptions are good while others are bad then it is difficult to see your reality as a single perspective.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)